A balance scale with a folded blank sheet in one pan and a worn chisel in the other. Illustration for Experiments beat assumptions.

How I think · 03

Experiments beat assumptions

A product idea is a hypothesis until someone's behaviour says otherwise.

A working rule. Not an absolute.

Entry updated 26 Oct 2026

I can be convinced by my own explanation of a product. That explanation is not demand. Demand shows up when someone tries to use the thing, pays for it, or changes how they work. Until then I am holding an assumption.

A useful experiment is small enough to run and sharp enough to surprise me. It names what I expect people to do, and it counts that behaviour rather than praise, visits, or how finished the interface looks.

Building the product and validating the demand are different jobs. I have felt that gap while making software: the build can go well and still leave the question of distribution unanswered. Shipping is not the same as being chosen.

After a test, the decision is to continue, change direction, or stop. Stopping is a result. It is not a failure of nerve if the behaviour did not show up.

Influences

  • The Lean Startup, by Eric Ries, is the book behind this language of hypotheses and feedback.

How I apply it

  • Write the assumption in one sentence before building the next slice.
  • Prefer a behaviour I can observe over a metric that only shows activity.
  • Keep a note of what would make me stop, before I am attached to the build.

What I can actually point to

  • I have several public products and several ideas that are not products. I have not published conversion numbers, revenue, or a claim that a particular experiment succeeded. The record on this site is the existence of the work, not its market result.

Where this could be wrong

  • Some systems, especially in finance and safety, should not be 'tested' on people casually. The experiment has to match the cost of being wrong.
  • A tiny test can also lie. The wrong audience, or a test that only measures curiosity, can be mistaken for demand.

What could change my mind?

  • A situation where more building, before any test, was clearly the responsible path because the assumption could not be probed any other way.
  • Evidence that my experiments are too small to teach me anything I did not already believe.

Connected in the notebook